X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:46:56 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: OpenSSH-4.6p1-1: Problems! Message-ID: <20070308174656.GV24859@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <45F04AF3 DOT F37E2E03 AT dessent DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F04AF3.F37E2E03@dessent.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 8 09:42, Brian Dessent wrote: > Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > > > I suggest to take the opportunity to switch to protocol 2 which is > > > the better and safer protocol anyway. > > > > I have tried, but : > > > > $ ssh -2 graziosi AT hostname > > Protocol major versions differ: 2 vs. 1 > > > > (openssh-4.5p1-1 with -2 gives the some result) > > What kind of backwater system is this that doesn't have support for SSH > v2? Version 2 has been the default for many, many years, and version 1 > is very deprecated/insecure/etc. Normally you shouldn't even have to > specify the version, as the client should negotiate it with the server. Assuming it's not a backwater system, it could also be a wrong setting in the server's sshd_config file. Look for the "Protocol" line. If it only contains "Protocol 1", you got the reason. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/