X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Raymond Miller" Subject: Re: GDB problem (under cygwin) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:33:21 +0100 Lines: 77 Message-ID: References: <45EF3A38 DOT 8030205 AT cygwin DOT com> <039501c761a3$58af5e80$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com No, I don't think that my program has a bug. Ok, this is the code of my program (C): #include int main () { printf("hello"); return 0; } Another code with the same problem (Segmentation fault) int main () { return 0; } And I could follow writting codes because all have the same problem. > we don't have your machine, I said that I only get that problem in this computer (a laptop with windows xp media center, intel core 2 duo t5600) > you haven't given an adequate description of the problem. Do you say that for my english? (if so, I'm sorry but cannot do more) If not, then tell me what I must explain more. "Dave Korn" escribió en el mensaje news:039501c761a3$58af5e80$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM... > On 08 March 2007 14:43, Raymond Miller wrote: > >> Finally I found what is the problem. > > No, I don't think you have. You haven't even clearly identified a > problem. > > You say that the problem is that gdb reports a SIGSEGV in thread 2 when > you > compiled with cygwin gcc, but for all anyone knows that could just be > because > your program caused a crash and thread 2 is the signal-handling thread in > cygwin programs. > > When you compile with mingw's gcc, you are compiling an entirely > different > program, because mingw doesn't support all the posix things like signals > etc. > that cygwin supports. > >> Is it a bug in that version? > > Again, nobody can tell. We don't have your code, we don't have your > machine, you haven't given an adequate description of the problem. Just > going > by sheer balance of probabilities, however, it is far more likely that gcc > is > doing the right thing and your program has a bug in it. > > cheers, > DaveK > -- > Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/