X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <45ED65D9.80901@byu.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:00:09 -0700
From: Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: st_birthtime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There is currently a thread on bug-gnulib about adding GNU tool support
for platforms that support st_birthtime in addition to st_atime, st_mtime,
and st_ctime.  Since Windows has a notion of birthtime (in fact, since
Windows calls their birthtime attribute a 'creation time', leading to
several people's confusion over what ctime really means), is it worth
cygwin 1.7 adding st_birthtime support?

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9 AT byu DOT net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF7WXY84KuGfSFAYARAis9AKC4w8xIRuvDkejQiAQJYMI9/85SAACdH4JZ
KECictojiGcwn7sk8ewb/CE=
=0QyM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/