X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <20070303230154 DOT GR3373 AT interface DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <20070303231338 DOT GS3373 AT interface DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <20070304001958 DOT GT3373 AT interface DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <20070304094144 DOT GB3204 AT interface DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> Subject: RE: javac? Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000a01c75e5d$281458a0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20070304094144.GB3204@interface.famille.thibault.fr> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id l24D1Blg002953 On 04 March 2007 09:42, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Igor Peshansky, le Sat 03 Mar 2007 23:05:31 -0500, a écrit : >>> Isn't there a way to have a working javac command by just installing >>> cygwin packages, or installing SUN's jdk is necessary? >> >> The scripts will translate Cygwin paths for you into Windows paths... The >> native Windows versions of Java will not understand Cygwin paths. Other >> than that, if you're only planning to use relative paths, you can stick >> with the native JDK. > > Well, I rather meant: can't we wrap gcc-java's gcj? I'd happily add such a wrapper script to the cygwin gcj distro, if someone wants to contribute one, and assuming there are no major technical objections. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/