X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:22:36 -0500 From: "Lev Bishop" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: script problem In-Reply-To: <000001c75dd9$8581a120$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <490598 DOT 58712 DOT qm AT web37206 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <002301c75cf7$db499aa0$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41> <000001c75dd9$8581a120$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/3/07, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > Does running fc-cache speed up your startup? > > > > Lev > > It hasn't bothered me enough to even look in to it frankly. My Cygwin > interactive shell startup times have been a bit slower than normal for years > because I have a bit of Perl/Cygpath magic in my bash_profile to despacify > PATH, which for whatever reason has always seemed to take quite a bit longer > than it should. I may look into it when I get enough of them round tuits, > but like I said it's still in the tolerable range for me. Fair enough, but it probably took you longer to write this email, than it would have for you to just type 'fc-cache' into your shell :-) Lev -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/