X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Thorsten Kampe <thorsten AT thorstenkampe DOT de>
Subject:  Re: Cygwin speed
Date:  Fri, 2 Mar 2007 20:29:16 -0000
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <esa1ep$6cv$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <45E86FFD DOT 7060301 AT princeton DOT edu> <45E876FA DOT 7401B017 AT dessent DOT net>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

* Brian Dessent (Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:11:54 -0800)
> Vinod Gupta wrote:
>> Cygwin was a slow by a factor of 3x. Is that normal?
> 
> Yes.

Actually no. The standard approximate guess is a factor of two which 
corresponds to Vinod's testings.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/