Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:28:06 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: just got wrong DLLs or wrong mutt.exe [attn mutt maintainer]
Message-ID: <20070224212806.GA6381@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20070224204033 DOT GA88109 AT shell DOT mho DOT net> <45E0A645 DOT 4020706 AT byu DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45E0A645.4020706@byu.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:55:33PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>According to Tom Hall on 2/24/2007 1:40 PM:
>>I think there's a bug in the Cygwin setup
>>
>>The problem turned out to be that the version of mutt.exe I got was
>>looking for /usr/bin/cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll and /usr/bin/cygssl-0.9.7.dll
>>but setup.exe sent me /usr/bin/cygcrypto-0.9.8.dll and
>>/usr/bin/cygssl-0.9.8.dll.  After copying the .7 versions from another
>>machine, mutt seems to be working fine :-).
>
>Actually, it means that Corinna's statement that "None of the packages
>in the Cygwin net distribution is built against openssl 0.9.7 anymore."
>in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2007-02/msg00016.html is wrong.
>The mutt maintainer needs to upload a new package in order to correct
>this.  Meanwhile, I will let Corinna or the mutt maintainer decide if
>the mutt setup.hint should be adjusted to point to openssl097
>compatibility package instead of openssl.

I'm in the process of generating a new mutt package now.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/