X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Matthew Woehlke Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.8e-1, openssl-devel-0.9.8e-1 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:21:15 -0600 Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <45DF627D DOT 9050109 AT cygwin DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061206 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 In-Reply-To: <45DF627D.9050109@cygwin.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > Chuck wrote: >> I have both openssl 0.9.8 and 0.9.7 installed. How can I find out what >> is using 097 and get rid of it if I don't need it anymore? > > Based on Corinna's comment, it's fair to assume that if you have this > package, it is because you have one of the following situations: > > 2. You had a package that used it but didn't get uninstalled > properly for some reason, leaving around openssl097. Shouldn't that be: 2. You had a package that used it at one point. ?? I wouldn't expect the installer to remove a legacy package A if, after installing B which depends on A, you then upgrade B so that it no longer needs A. How would it know that you didn't meanwhile build something that uses A? -- Matthew Vs lbh pna ernq guvf jvgubhg fbsgjner, lbh ner n FREVBHF areq! -- Nqncgrq sebz Znggurj Jva (ivz-qri znvyvat yvfg) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/