X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45DC68B1.6090605@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:43:45 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: FW: Re: [emacs_user AT hotmail DOT com: ***MEMORY-ERROR***: emacs[5172]: GSlice: failed References: <45D9678E DOT 7090108 AT swipnet DOT se> <45DA98EF DOT 6040205 AT swipnet DOT se> <45DB2A13 DOT 6070606 AT swipnet DOT se> <45DC1AAD DOT 5050109 AT swipnet DOT se> In-Reply-To: <45DC1AAD.5050109@swipnet.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Jan Djärv wrote: > Larry Hall wrote: > > Jan D. wrote: >> > It seems that when Emacs defines its own malloc and friends, memalign >> > returns ENOSYS. But emacs defines its own memalign as well. >> Shouldn't that >> > one be called? >> >> >> Seems like it though it sounds like something that would be controlled by >> the emacs configure script to me. >> > > I don't follow. How can the Emacs configure script make sure the Emacs > supplied memalign is called by glib? Ah, sorry. I missed that you were referring to glib. I agree that there should be some consistency here. Perhaps things would work better if Emacs used none of it's own m* implementations. That's just a WAG. I really have no experience with the Emacs code base. But it does sound to me like this would be Emacs configurable at least. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/