X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: Markus =?iso-8859-1?q?Sch=F6nhaber?= Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: xargs problem Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:34:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <1171899485 DOT 45d9c45d44ef0 AT www DOT domainfactory-webmail DOT de> In-Reply-To: <1171899485.45d9c45d44ef0@www.domainfactory-webmail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702191734.17079.mailing-cygwin@schoenhaber.de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Markus Hoenicka wrote: > maybe I'm being dense, but xargs does not seem to do what it should: > > $ echo test1 test2|xargs -t > /bin/echo test1 test2 > test1 test2 > > I'd expect the output to read: > > /bin/echo test1 > test1 > /bin/echo test2 > test2 > > What am I doing wrong? Your expectation is wrong. xargs will - by default - not start a seperate instance of the to-be-executed process for each of the arguments it reads from stdin, but instead it gathers some and feeds them to the process at once. You can limit the number or args each sub-process will be fed with -n or --max-args. I. e. echo test1 test2|xargs -t -n 1 should do what you expect. BTW: this is not Cygwin-specific. Regards mks -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/