X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45D717B3.895C05CF@dessent.net> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:56:51 -0800 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problems with setup.exe snapshots? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Angelo Graziosi wrote: > In any case, this does not seem excluded completely from setup.ini > (or .hint): > > 1) there is 'ec-fonts-mftraced' that depend on -tiny; > > 2) also 'tetex' depend on -tiny and ldesc says > > "...This virtual tetex package will install tetex-bin and tetex-tiny, > the minimal working teTeX setup. It is advised to install tetex-base > too. If you have plenty of bandwith, find the rest of teTeX in > tetex-extra and tetex-doc." > > So I am confused: to install TeTeX completely, which package should be > selected and which NO? > > Should we 'ping' the TeTeX maintainer? Well, my understanding of the packages may be faulty. I just know that I have tetex-bin,base,extra installed but not -tiny and everything works ok. > When I saw the same postinstall to be included in more than a package, I > suspected that something was wrong. > > Now with your dettailed explanation, more things are enlightened. I've made a patch to setup that works around this issue and created a new snapshot (2.558). Give it a try and see if it fixes the issue for you. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/