X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:31:40 +0100 (MET) From: Angelo Graziosi To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problems with setup.exe snapshots? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Brian Dessent wrote: > First, a note: tetex-base and tetex-tiny are meant to be mutually > exclusive: you should install one or the other but not both. I did not knew this. In any case, this does not seem excluded completely from setup.ini (or .hint): 1) there is 'ec-fonts-mftraced' that depend on -tiny; 2) also 'tetex' depend on -tiny and ldesc says "...This virtual tetex package will install tetex-bin and tetex-tiny, the minimal working teTeX setup. It is advised to install tetex-base too. If you have plenty of bandwith, find the rest of teTeX in tetex-extra and tetex-doc." So I am confused: to install TeTeX completely, which package should be selected and which NO? Should we 'ping' the TeTeX maintainer? > All three of tetex-tiny,extra,base own the file > /etc/postinstall/post-texmf.sh. When I saw the same postinstall to be included in more than a package, I suspected that something was wrong. Now with your dettailed explanation, more things are enlightened. Thanks, Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/