X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:33:06 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Using the snapshot 20070214
Message-ID: <20070215093306.GC4158@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0702150140470 DOT 2703-100000 AT ax0rm1 DOT roma1 DOT infn DOT it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0702150140470.2703-100000@ax0rm1.roma1.infn.it>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb 15 02:12, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> 
> After installing and rebasing (-b 0x65000000 as suggested) the current

This was only suggested if the normal rebase still results in problems.

> snapshot 20070214, using it I have found these problems.
> [...]
> emacs-22.0.93.exe.stackdump
> ---------------------------------
> Stack trace:
> Frame     Function  Args
> 0022B1A8  7C802532  (0000067C, 0000EA60, 000000A4, 0022B1F0)
> 0022B2C8  610AF43C  (00000000, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000)
> 0022B3B8  610ACFBB  (00000000, 003B0023, 00230000, 00000000)
> 0022B418  610AD49B  (0022B430, 00000000, 00000094, 0095F000)
> 0022B4D8  610AD652  (00000F94, 00000006, 006DE801, 61026E43)
> 0022B508  610AA8B8  (00000006, 60FF0000, 0022B638, 610AF4FC)
> 0022B5F8  61026F60  (0000067C, 0000EA60, 000000A4, 0022B640)
> 0022B718  610AF4FC  (00000000, 0022BE78, 0022BDF8, 610842B2)
> 0022B808  610ACFBB  (00000000, 00000010, 00000000, 0044B400)
> 0022B868  610AD49B  (0022B880, 00000000, 00000094, 0022B8C8)
> 0022B928  610AD652  (00000F94, 00000006, 0022B958, 00552D10)
> 0022B938  610AA8B8  (00000000, 00A90000, 0022B958, 00AB2000)
> 0022B958  00552D10  (00AA16D8, 015316F8, 00000840, 00000000)
> 0022B998  00553788  (FFFDE000, 00A4ACF0, 0022BBA8, 0045C1B1)
> 0022B9F8  00551F31  (0000F7E8, 00000037, 611BAA48, 61067AEC)
> 0022BA08  004F3E71  (0000F7E8, 0000002E, 0022BA68, 00452245)
> End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present)
> ---------------------------------

Any chance you can debug this further by yourself?

> /usr/bin/../lib/libg.a(lib_a-fwrite.o):(.text+0x49): undefined reference
> to `___cygwin_lock_lock' 
> 
> ... MANY "undefined reference to `___cygwin_lock_unlock'"

The gold old libg.a problem.  Remove libg.a and create a symlink
libg.a -> libcygwin.a.

I fixed my snapshot script to create the symlink automatically now.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/