X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Joe Smith" <unknown_kev_cat AT hotmail DOT com>
Subject:  Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc.
Date:  Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:21:06 -0500
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <eqdjcg$jhp$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <020d01c748b4$62d8b170$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20070205030939 DOT GB24653 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; 	format=flowed; 	charset="iso-8859-1"; 	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


"Christopher Faylor" wrote in message 
news:20070205030939 DOT GB24653 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx...
>[snip]
> I guess this means that I need to generate a cross-binutils, too.

Is a cross-binutils really needed? Which (if any) of the binutils act 
differently when targeted at MingW32
than when targeted at Cygwin?

(I've never worked with a cross toolchain where the executable format of the 
host and target are the same.) 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/