X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <45C0971E DOT 4080305 AT byu DOT net> <20070131132700 DOT GA3478 AT implementation DOT labri DOT fr> <20070131133102 DOT GA17405 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070131134842 DOT GU27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070131153914 DOT GB19137 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <020001c748b0$a56f3080$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20070205030029 DOT GA24653 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Subject: A bit random I know but.. [was RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?]
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 04:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <023001c748db$16ed8110$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <20070205030029.GA24653@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 05 February 2007 03:01, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:03:12PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 31 January 2007 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> Sorry, but we don't support Linux on this mailing list. ;)
>>> 
>>> Yes we do.  I just changed the cygwin web page.  :-)
>> 
>>  Copyright line needs updating...
> 
> What in the world does this have to do with the subject or contents of
> this email?


  You saying you changed the web page made me notice that it's been updated
this year and still has last year's copyright date on it.  I thought it was
probably one of those things like the gpl copyright boiler plate at the top of
every source file that needs updating the first time the file gets patched in
the new year... :)


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/