X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:18:13 -0500 From: "Dave Wright" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Bug with AES key byte order in cygcrypto-0.9.8.dll? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: d78e02d1593951c3 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I'm seeing a difference byte order handling between cygcrypto-0.9.8.dll (0.9.8d-1) and cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll (0.9.7l-1) in AES_set_encrypt_key (and set_decrypt_key). Specifically, the 0.9.8 version doesn't appear to swap the byte order into LE correctly. The behavior and key byte order of 0.9.7 matches the other non-cygwin platforms I've tested on, including libcrypto 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 on Linux and OSX, so the problem appears to be something specific to the cygwin build. Test case: unsigned char key[256] = {0xb6, 0x6d, 0x7b, 0x21, 0x71, 0x34, 0x2e, 0xe7, 0x99, 0xce, 0x20, 0x6d, 0x5f, 0x10, 0x26, 0x55, 0x8e, 0xa8, 0xc3, 0xdf, 0xfc, 0x1a, 0x39, 0x59, 0x6a, 0x7c, 0x8f, 0xa3, 0x91, 0xa7, 0xbe, 0xd6}; AES_KEY kv; AES_set_encrypt_key(key, 128, &kv); print /x kv (on cygcrypto 0.9.8): {rd_key = {0x217b6db6, 0xe72e3471, 0x6d20ce99, 0x5526105f,... (on cygcrypto 0.9.7): {rd_key = {0xb66d7b21, 0x71342ee7, 0x99ce206d, 0x5f102655,... ..the first four values of rd_key SHOULD match the bytes of the key (as in 0.9.7), but on 0.9.8 they have not been byte swapped correctly for the x86 platform. There are #defines in aes_locl.h that control the byte ordering, but they appear to only do something different for MSVC compilers. -Dave Wright -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/