X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:39:46 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc? Message-ID: <20070201103946.GY27843@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20070201101648 DOT GD25688 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070201101648.GD25688@ns1.anodized.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Feb 1 02:16, Christopher Layne wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:13:37AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > When I was maintaining cygwin's gcc, I often thought about eliminating > > -mno-cygwin and just providing a pure mingw cross compiler in the > > distribution. I really don't know why it wasn't done that way to begin > > with. I have vague recollections of arguing for this when -mno-cygwin > > was first introduced by Geoff Noer but apparently I wasn't very > > persuasive. > > > > I know that this will probably be another "Death of Cygwin predicted" > > Fine by me. Can we slip in removing text mounts at the same time? ;) Oooooh, now you spoiled the surprise. I hoped to get the text mode out secretly... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/