X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:36:17 +1300
From: Danny Smith <dannysmith AT clear DOT net DOT nz>
Subject: RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?
In-reply-to: <20070131131337.GA17256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <000001c745ba$8496d6e0$744861cb@anykey>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


cgf wrote
> 
> How about if we eliminate -mno-cygwin from future releases and either
> provide our own mingw cross-tools or wrap the offerings from 
> mingw.org?


I would miss -mno-cygwin.  Gcc -mno-cygwin suppports symlinks, mingw
doesn't.

--host=i686-pc-cygwin --target=i686-pc-cygwin would be a lovely
replacement,
 so I wouldn't miss it for long. 

Danny


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/