X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Eric Lilja Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc? Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:16:10 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4C89134832705D4D85A6CD2EBF38AE0FC59E55 AT PAUMAILU03 DOT ags DOT agere DOT com> <20070131175124 DOT GA23286 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <2bf229d30701311137o64e06e1eq8a7dc228982258c3 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: <2bf229d30701311137o64e06e1eq8a7dc228982258c3@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> I just thought that something which provides similar functionality to >> what is available now would be required. That means MinGW versions of >> gcc and binutils. > > As long as I'm able to compile w32api and mingw-runtime for MinGW from > within Cygwin, I'll be a happy camper. > > Chris > I agree with Chris. If removing -mno-cygwin solves a few problem I'm for it as long as I am to do what Chris mentions without having to install anything other than what's accessible from the cygwin setup. Changing some Makefiles is not an issue for me and if it solves some problems it's a good thing. - Eric -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/