X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <3037.70.57.74.159.1170264802.squirrel@70.57.74.159>
In-Reply-To: <20070131105140.GQ27843@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <20070122181727 DOT GC27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>     <1552 DOT 67 DOT 40 DOT 28 DOT 188 DOT 1169493973 DOT squirrel AT 67 DOT 40 DOT 28 DOT 188>     <20070122202137 DOT GC20665 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>     <45B540FF DOT 6060101 AT x-ray DOT at>     <20070123083753 DOT GE27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>     <45B62E0B DOT 4080500 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz> <45BBCF84 DOT 7070409 AT x-ray DOT at>     <20070128120735 DOT GK27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>     <4903 DOT 67 DOT 42 DOT 100 DOT 49 DOT 1170014267 DOT squirrel AT 67 DOT 42 DOT 100 DOT 49>     <20070131105140 DOT GQ27843 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Perl bug?
From: "Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes" <sthoenna AT efn DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> On Jan 28 11:57, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > Thanks for the info.  It's interesting to know.  What I still don't
>> get,
>> > however, is the fact that the same statement does not waste memory on
>> > the x86 Linux Perl 5.8.5, but does on the x86 Cygwin Perl 5.8.7 and
>> the
>> > x86_64 Linux 5.8.8.  So it has been introduced only in later versions?
>> > And why is it defended?  It doesn't seem to make sense, rather on the
>> > contrary.
>>
>> This behaviour hasn't changed that I know of.  I verified that a 5.8.5
>> cygwin perl behaves the same way.  Could you confirm your x86 Linux
>> Perl 5.8.5 results again, and send me (privately if you wish) the
>> output of: perl -MConfig=config_sh -we'print config_sh' from that
>> perl?
>
> I just ran the testcase under strace on the Linux box again and to my
> surprise it behaved identical to the Cygwin and the 64 bit Linux
> version, as you say.  What have I done wrong in my first tests?  Was I
> hallucinating, caffein-induced maybe?

Perhaps your command history could tell you?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/