X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: References: <20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Subject: RE: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc? Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:21:08 -0000 Message-ID: <051f01c74553$d20a4900$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 31 January 2007 16:19, Brian Ford wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> If we REALLY wanted to preserve -mno-cygwin, we could do so as a shell >> script wrapper for gcc but, personally, I think I'd rather just tell >> people to use the cross-compiler. > > Why not just alias -mno-cygwin to -b i686-mingw? Because it always works better to invoke the real driver than to try and play -B/-V games.... :) cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/