X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:18:33 -0600
From: Brian Ford <Brian DOT Ford AT FlightSafety DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Eliminating -mno-cygwin from gcc?
In-Reply-To: <20070131131337.GA17256@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Message-ID: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0701311015180.3176@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com>
References: <20070131131337 DOT GA17256 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> If we REALLY wanted to preserve -mno-cygwin, we could do so as a shell
> script wrapper for gcc but, personally, I think I'd rather just tell
> people to use the cross-compiler.

Why not just alias -mno-cygwin to -b i686-mingw?

-- 
Brian Ford
Lead Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew...

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/