X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45BE37F3.30504@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:07:47 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: trouble with bash / if in recent release / update ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Tim Hanson wrote: > hi, a colleague and i recently tried upgrading an existing cygwin and found that > basic bash script features broke. he later went back to a working copy, tested > and discovered that the features worked, upgraded again and confirmed that they > were broken again. i've searched for hints that others have had this problem and > haven't found any. the symptoms are pretty easy to test. > > in an interactive bash shell one can conform that these two if statements work: > > if [[ -z "17" ]]; then echo "ja"; else echo "ne"; fi > ne > > if [[ -z "" ]]; then echo "ja"; else echo "ne"; fi > ja > > if one then builds a bash script consisting only of #!/usr/bin/bash > and this if statement (broken into separate lines) it fails along these lines: > > $ test.bash > : command not test.bash: line 9: > /usr/local/bin/test.bash: line 10: syntax error in conditional expression > 'usr/local/bin/test.bash: line 10: syntax error near `]] > 'usr/local/bin/test.bash: line 10: `if [[ -z "$1" ]] > > does this ring a bell for anyone? > > i'd be grateful for pointers. (or advice on how to provide more clues.) Your line-endings are CRNLs. The best thing to do is to run d2u on the scripts in question. Read any recent Cygwin bash announcements for other options to resolve this situation and further details. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/