X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <8650524.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:54:36 -0800 (PST) From: -VASKO- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gettext 0.14.5 - some warnings on compiling In-Reply-To: <45B95DA2.7060301@byu.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: vasko2k AT hot DOT ee References: <8613865 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <45B8B094 DOT 3020805 AT byu DOT net> <45B8B138 DOT 4060100 AT byu DOT net> <45B95DA2 DOT 7060301 AT byu DOT net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake-1 wrote: > > > It depends on whether the warning was masking a bug or not. But you are > better off reporting such bugs to the upstream maintainers - oftentimes, > that warning indicates a true bug where someone has compiled on Linux and > used wchar_t when they should have used wint_t, but other times, it is > benign. What makes this particular error annoying is that there is no way > (except in CVS gcc) to disable it when it is a false positive, and > restructuring the comparison to avoid the warning can sometimes be rather > difficult. > > So, to whom I should report about these warnings to get skilled suggestions for fast fixing or confirmations for safely ignoring it? Anybody can really help ? Thanks a lot. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/gettext-0.14.5---some-warnings-on-compiling-tf3105340.html#a8650524 Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/