X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:07:50 -0800 From: Christopher Layne To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin source question Message-ID: <20070122110750.GD25379@ns1.anodized.com> References: <20070121143731 DOT GC25379 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <009401c73d79$4cf91d40$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <00b401c73e11$fdc39d10$a501a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00b401c73e11$fdc39d10$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.00000 X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes X-Assp-Envelope-From: clayne AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com X-Assp-Intended-For: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:42:19AM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: > ... so no reason not to choose whichever you like the best. > > cheers, > DaveK I prefer the idiom that doesn't resemble perl :). Also, if it were me, I'd just be checking for zero or non-zero. The rest seems like a lot of hoop jumping for not much gain. -cl -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/