X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: Default For Install Should Be Install Everything Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:25:44 -0500 Message-ID: <31DDB7BE4BF41D4888D41709C476B657068AA87C@NIHCESMLBX5.nih.gov> In-Reply-To: <45B04971.4060408@cygwin.com> References: <93668 DOT 24629 DOT qm AT web31512 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <45B04971 DOT 4060408 AT cygwin DOT com> From: "Buchbinder, Barry \(NIH/NIAID\) [E]" To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id l0JHQ9kI006024 Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote on Thursday, January 18, 2007 11:31 PM: > Michael Boom wrote: >> When people I tell about Cygwin install it, they tend to use the >> default. They don't realize that by clicking the word "Default", it >> will change to Install, and install everything. I think the default >> should be to install everything. Few people are going to read the >> installation documentation and few people want to install less than >> everything. Does anyone agree? If so who should I send my opinion >> to? > > If you're having problems getting people you tell to install Cygwin > with all packages, why not tell them how to install everything? Or, > if you think that's too complex, you could provide a custom package > server that allows them to download and install everything (see > ). Just > set up a dummy package that's part of the base category and depends > on every other package. Point folks you want to have install > everything to your server and "voila!", you're done. Or you could > provide patches to 'setup.exe' to insert a page with the more > traditional coarse options of "Full", "Minimal", and "Custom" options > (see ). I'd argue even > with today's world of more broadband connections, defaulting the > install to download upward of a GB worth of packages is still going > to be an issue for most. But I believe that even if that's not true, > having a clearer way to install everything would probably resolve any > current confusion, regardless of the default option set. As for who > you should tell, well, I guess that's this list. If all you want to > do is tell people about your opinion, I think you're done. If you're > interested in doing more than just presenting your opinion, I've > provided you with a few options to consider as well. :-) I would also add that sometimes disk space is an issue, not only bandwidth. If there is a vote, I'll go with "default = the minimum to get up and running". - Barry - Disclaimer: Statements made herein are not made on behalf of NIAID. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/