X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:05:32 +1100 (EST) From: Luke Kendall Subject: Re: Changed handling of "!" in /bin/sh? To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20070117233055.GA21694@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20070118070532.F06FB842EF@pessard.research.canon.com.au> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 17 Jan, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:14:27PM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: > >Eric Blake wrote on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:18 PM: > >> According to Luke Kendall on 1/16/2007 6:53 PM: > >>> > >>> Or, copy /bin/ash.exe to replace /bin/sh.exe. > >> > >> Not recommended. The reason cygwin moved to bash as > >> /bin/sh was to avoid ash bugs. > > > >I thought that it was more to avoid all the complaints > >that sh did not behave like bash, which is what many > >people expected. > > You're right that was also a reason. Wow, I'm really showing my age, aren't I? :-) luke -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/