X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 07:12:40 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin Python/PIL TCL/TK fork rebase solution Message-ID: <20070116121240.GB9167@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <87ejpvluvj DOT fsf AT superfluity DOT lefae DOT org> <3D1F5241A4BA56B7EBA1D30B AT qjunbur DOT quns DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D1F5241A4BA56B7EBA1D30B@qjunbur.quns.cam.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:37:46AM +0000, Robin Walker wrote: >So, what is it about Cygwin DLLs that makes them apparently sensitive to >base address in a way that normal Windows DLLs are not? "fork()" cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/