X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45ABB935.5080702@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:26:13 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061221 Fedora/1.5.0.9-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: struct passwd problem : running on XP References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DEMARCHE wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm runnning Cygwin 1.5.23 on XP and my C program refers to pwd.h library. > > It seems like the /etc/passwd file struct is not compliant with the C struct > password ( as defined in pwd.h ). > > Indeed, users are defined as : > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > bdemarch121406:unused_by_nt/2000/xp:97662:10545:bdemarch121406,U- > EUR\bdemarch121406,S-1-5-21-2052699199-3915784498-1582209984- > 87662:/home/bdemarch121406:/bin/bash > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > and struct passwd : > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > struct passwd { > char *pw_name; /* user name */ > char *pw_passwd; /* encrypted password */ > uid_t pw_uid; /* user uid */ > gid_t pw_gid; /* user gid */ > char *pw_comment; /* comment */ > char *pw_gecos; /* Honeywell login info */ > char *pw_dir; /* home directory */ > char *pw_shell; /* default shell */ > }; > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > May be I'm wrong, but the number of items doesn't correspond to each other. > > May be I'm worng but I think that the gcc compiler is not able to parse each > items. > I thank you for all details and explanations. Ignore the pw_comment field. It is not used. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/