X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 12:39:22 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.7.0 CVS mmap failure
Message-ID: <20070113173922.GA28686@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0701051144030 DOT 2880 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20070105182234 DOT GC12776 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0701051237090 DOT 2880 AT PC1163-8460-XP DOT flightsafety DOT com> <20070105192302 DOT GD12776 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070110095345 DOT GL23638 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070111063859 DOT GF19638 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <20070111094647 DOT GQ23638 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070113082207 DOT GE14559 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <20070113102508 DOT GC23638 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20070113142918 DOT GH19638 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070113142918.GH19638@ns1.anodized.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:29:18AM -0800, Christopher Layne wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:25:08AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Jan 13 00:22, Christopher Layne wrote:
>>>The real question I have is why was what *should* have worked, not
>>>working?
>>
>>That has been answered immediately in the replies:
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00093.html
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00095.html
>>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-01/msg00097.html
>>
>
>Okay, I'll file this under "looks like this is it, so it's probably
>it."
>
>A little less snark - a little more acceptance and understanding goes a
>long way.

You could also file it under "In a long running discussion, reading
responses and asking for specific clarification is better than just
asking general questions which seem to imply that you haven't been
paying attention."

YMMV.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/