X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45A2EF6D.4020100@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:27:09 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061108 Fedora/1.5.0.8-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install References: <003001c73199$3b55e230$0201a8c0 AT neo> <45A05CDC DOT 1020909 AT cygwin DOT com> <002401c73313$13077700$0201a8c0 AT neo> <45A266CC DOT 5090806 AT cygwin DOT com> <4e41f5c20701081705p28300579l2ae1de77b387edc8 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4e41f5c20701081705p28300579l2ae1de77b387edc8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com You too. . Reformatted. Morgan Gangwere wrote: > On 1/8/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) cygwin com> wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ And here too - >> - reformatted. >> >> Sam The Cat wrote: >> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" >> > cygwin com> >> > To: cygwin com> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> . No need to feed the >> spammers. >> >> > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 9:37 PM >> > Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install >> > >> > >> >> Sam The Cat wrote: >> >>> figure this one out (I think) >> >>> >> >>> the first pass of the gcc (cc1) was looking for a dll "cygintl-3.dll" >> >>> this could not be found. I did find "cygintl-8.dll" which shows >> >>> modification as of 10/22/2006. Not sure if it is a complete fix but >> >>> I copied the "cygintl-8.dll" file and renamed it "cygintl-3.dll" and >> >>> the gcc now passes a rudementaly hello.c complile. >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> That's a truly terrible way to solve your problem. A better way would >> >> have >> >> been to consult to find the package you >> >> were >> >> missing (libintl3) and install it. I recommend you do that >> >> immediately if >> >> you don't want to suffer from more problems as a result of your >> attempt >> >> above. >> >> >> > ok -- I accept that my sol'n was not optimal but how do I >> accomplish what >> > you suggesting ? On the web site I see there 5 versions of the >> > interntionalization library but on the setup tool where I specify what >> > package to isntall I am only given the option for the latest. How >> do I >> > install a package that I need that setup does not offer me ? >> > >> >> >> Try another mirror. showed me the libintl, >> linintl1, libintl2, libintl3, and libintl8 packages. As long as you >> can find the package at , there's going to >> be at least one mirror out there with the package in question. >> > well, there is a fundamental flaw here in the distribution system then. > i have looked at the versions from (agast!) three different mirrors > and they have so far been completely different. i have found (long > ago, dont know if this was fixed) a version 0.3.4 of bash _on_ that > mirrors package list. o think what we need to do in _this_ case is to > *standardise* (oh my! standardization!) because if we're not careful > we'll end up in DLL HELL. > i propose a round-robin approach, **I am _not_ saying i will do it** > its just a good idea.. that would make it so that if a new version of > the package came out, the main server would have it and we would have > to say WASFM... its too hard > Mirrors are not a controlled hierarchical system. Mirrors *pull* information from cygwin.com. cygwin.com does not *push* this information out. If you have any questions about how mirrors are handled and where to report those that seem out-of-date to you for some unreasonable period of time, see - . -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/