X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Markus Elfring'" , , Cc: "'Christopher R. Gabriel'" , "'Paul Eggert'" Subject: RE: How to resolve hiccups by patch program? Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:19:18 -0000 Message-ID: <023e01c7331f$38720df0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <22728248.1168253857622.JavaMail.fmail@fmcert01.dlan.cinetic.de> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 08 January 2007 10:58, Markus Elfring wrote: > Hello, > > I published the file "const4.patch" > (http://bugs.digium.com/file_download.php?file_id=12617&type=bug) > I assume that I am not affected by wrong line endings as it was suggested > for the topic 'Is "Patch" broken?'. > http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2004-04/msg00334.html I think you are, since your patch has CRLF line ends. If you're using Tortoise, it's probably auto-mangling the line-ends for you. It likes to be "helpful" like that, but what you actually tend to end up with is a working tree that isn't interoperable with cygwin. Does running d2u over the rejected hunk fix your problem? Does generating the patch by the commandline svn client under cygwin generate a patch in the correct format for the patch utility under cygwin? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/