X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:55:09 -0600 From: Brian Ford Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.0 CVS mmap failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070105095752 DOT GB28768 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Brian Ford wrote: > Ok, after further investigation, this is a /3GB boot.ini flag interaction. > Unfortunately, this is a critical flag for our application, so all our > machines are configured this way. That is why I failed to realize its > significance before. > > I understand if this is now too much of an obscure case for you to be > interested in. If so, I'll try to look into it soon on my own. I suspect > it must have been related to your MEM_TOP_DOWN change. One more tidbit before I have time to find the real problem. Compiling the test case with -Wl,large-address-aware makes the test pass on a /3GB system. -- Brian Ford Lead Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/