X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4593311D.1050904@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:51:09 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061108 Fedora/1.5.0.8-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Updated cygwin dlls cause unnecessary reboot on NT References: <458FDC4E DOT 9040505 AT cygwin DOT com> <458FEC2E DOT 70705 AT tlinx DOT org> <45902BC4 DOT 50803 AT tlinx DOT org> <4590BD4E DOT 5020905 AT cygwin DOT com> <45910426 DOT 9030603 AT tlinx DOT org> <459133CB DOT 3080102 AT ukf DOT net> <45916391 DOT 1090906 AT tlinx DOT org> <20061228014045 DOT GA6220 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 07:17:47PM -0600, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>> Igor Peshansky wrote: >>>> Open-source works by scratching your itch, not by getting someone >>>> else to scratch it for you. >>> Actually getting someone else to scratch that itch sometimes does work! >> Right! And, the perfect way to have the itch scratched is to claim >> that you know better than everyone else, imply that people don't care >> about the end-user experience, assert that you won't even bother >> submitting a patch because it would be automatically rejected for no >> good reason, rail about flaws in open source, ignore patient attempts >> to explain how things work, and never give up in the face of logical >> arguments, relying instead on repeating all of the above ad infinitum. >> >> This technique is, apparently, a sure-fire way to get someone to do >> something for you. We're just still in the ad infinitum stage. As soon >> as that stage is over, someone will surely get to work on this crucial >> patch. > I was being funny (and I did have a smiley though I don't see it in the > quote). You are apparently being sarcastic. > > No that is not the perfect way as you describe, sarcasm aside. There are > ways to be gently persuasive ya know. Indeed often times just bringing > up a technical topic, even through a raging argument, spurs creative > solutions and engineers being what they are often get motivated to find > that solution (though perhaps not this bunch...;-) > > BTW That last bit was intended to be a joke. > Was not! (Now you counter with "Was to" and we'll bat that back and forth until one of us yells for Mom. ;-) ) I also made the observation that discussion can be persuasive, though the one in this thread wasn't meeting that goal. I may be wrong but my guess is that folks on this list do accept that discussion and persuasion are not mutually exclusive. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/