X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <45932902.5010001@cygwin.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:16:34 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061108 Fedora/1.5.0.8-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Updated cygwin dlls cause unnecessary reboot on NT
References: <458FDC4E DOT 9040505 AT cygwin DOT com> <458FEC2E DOT 70705 AT tlinx DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0612251346240 DOT 27982 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <45902BC4 DOT 50803 AT tlinx DOT org> <4590BD4E DOT 5020905 AT cygwin DOT com> <45910426 DOT 9030603 AT tlinx DOT org> <459133CB DOT 3080102 AT ukf DOT net> <45916391 DOT 1090906 AT tlinx DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 63 DOT 0612261313480 DOT 27982 AT access1 DOT cims DOT nyu DOT edu> <emv5vt$2om$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <20061228014045 DOT GA6220 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20061228014045.GA6220@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 07:17:47PM -0600, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> Igor Peshansky wrote:
>>> Open-source works by scratching your itch, not by getting someone else
>>> to scratch it for you.
>> Actually getting someone else to scratch that itch sometimes does work!
> 
> Right! And, the perfect way to have the itch scratched is to claim that
> you know better than everyone else, imply that people don't care about
> the end-user experience, assert that you won't even bother submitting a
> patch because it would be automatically rejected for no good reason,
> rail about flaws in open source, ignore patient attempts to explain how
> things work, and never give up in the face of logical arguments, relying
> instead on repeating all of the above ad infinitum.
> 
> This technique is, apparently, a sure-fire way to get someone to do
> something for you.  We're just still in the ad infinitum stage.  As soon
> as that stage is over, someone will surely get to work on this crucial
> patch.


Phew!  That's a relief.  Just one question - will the patch be back-ported
to Window 3.11?  I need it badly! ;-)


-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/