X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <89c3ea2b0612221948w4528d90bk5a934f3a5bd727b0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:48:41 -0500 From: "andy wang" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is it possible to directly call a function in a dlopen library In-Reply-To: <458CA19A.DD0291F3@dessent.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <89c3ea2b0612212204g4cf5ee2bg4b90780aaab85c0f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <458C0887 DOT 6080201 AT cygwin DOT com> <89c3ea2b0612221906l7e99c12m2776e0c2b13f5568 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <458CA19A DOT DD0291F3 AT dessent DOT net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi, Brain: Your answer is always the guide. Thanks a lot! So maybe it is possible on Linux? I asked this question because I find this kind of logic in asterisk! the main program will load the .so using dlopen. i.e. module1.so and module2.so, and I notice that module2.so will call directly (without dlsym, just func1( ... ) which is defined in module1.so). I am very confused :-(. Is it because it used RTLD_GLOBAL? * RTLD_GLOBAL - the external symbols defined in the library will be made * available to subsequently loaded libraries. Regards, Andy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/