X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <89c3ea2b0612221906l7e99c12m2776e0c2b13f5568@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:06:53 -0500 From: "andy wang" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is it possible to directly call a function in a dlopen library In-Reply-To: <458C0887.6080201@cygwin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <89c3ea2b0612212204g4cf5ee2bg4b90780aaab85c0f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <458C0887 DOT 6080201 AT cygwin DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi, Larry, Thanks for the reply. > > i.e. > > module1.dll > > { > > int myfunc1() { do something; } > > } > > > > module2.dll > > { > > int myfunc2() { myfunc1(); do other things;} > > } > > > > main.exe > > { > > dlopen("module1.dll") > > dlopen("module2.dll") > > .... some tricky and mystery procedure. > > myfunc2(); //directly call or using dlsym() > > } > > > > > Why not? There's nothing about dl* functions in Cygwin that make > using them any different from UNIX/Linux platforms. Are you seeing > some problem? > On the module2.dll, I just want to directly call myfunc1 without using dlsym(), is that possible? I was just wondering that I just dlopen module1 and module2, then directly call the function without dlsym(). I know that it is not a strictly cygwin-related question :-) Regards, Andy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/