X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:26:08 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problems with the new Cygwin-1.5.23-1 Message-ID: <20061220102608.GP8345@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20061219210408 DOT GO8345 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Dec 19 22:19, Eric Lilja wrote: > Corinna Vinschen skrev: > >On Dec 19 20:19, Angelo Graziosi wrote: > >>After installing Cygwin-1.5.23-1, I have tried to build Emacs-CVS. > >> > >>But the build fails as shown below. The failure DOES NOT happen > >>using/reinstalling Cygwin-1.5.22-1 (i.e. the prev). > >>[...] > >>/usr/bin/../lib/libg.a(lib_a-fwrite.o):(.text+0x49): undefined reference > >>to `___cygwin_lock_lock' > > > >This is a packaging bug in 1.5.23-1. For now you can fix it after > >installing 1.5.23-1 like this: > > > > $ cd /usr/lib > > $ rm libg.a > > $ ln -s libcygwin.a libg.a > > > > How come I was not hit by it? Maybe a difference in the steps to build > cvs emacs or something else? A difference in configuring maybe, which doesn't try to link to libg.a. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/