X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45836E46.6080301@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:55:50 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: xemacs-21.4.20-2/xemacs-tags-21.4.20-2/xemacs-emacs-common-21.4.20-2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > A new version of 'xemacs' has been uploaded to a server near you. > * Fix: xpm no-X builds were broken on cygwin with /bin/gcc. Was this a libXpm-noX deficiency, or something else? > * Fix: Support renamed xpm no-X library under cygwin. Whoops. I meant to include compatibility link/import libraries but I forgot: e.g. /usr/lib/noX/libXpm.dll.a -> /usr/lib/noX/libXpm-noX.dll.a However, now that xemacs has already adapted to the new name, AND xemacs is the only known user of this library, I wonder if it is worth it to release a new version with those compatibility links, now? -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/