X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4573FB9F.D22C44F6@dessent.net> Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 02:42:39 -0800 From: Brian Dessent X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gpgme References: <195b3f1f0612040149s453fbcf5s46a98d757dbed7fc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Did you really need to start a new thread for this? Wynfield Henman wrote: > I saw the reference to "gpgme" with some misleading (to me) version > number, such as 1.1.2, tacked on and said it was in ...somewhere like > ../cygwin/ports. ...... Cygwin Ports is a separate project. Type it into Google and follow the first hit. It's off-topic for this list because it has its own mailing list. > guess cygwin rules/convention requires a different numbering system??? Um, no. Have you even looked at the gpgme ftp site? ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gpgme/ > Hearing that gpgme has a port I executed setup.exe and searched for > gpgme, but it is not there (or I can't find it alphabetically). You need to add the URL to setup.exe if you want to use it. Again, it's not part of the official Cygwin project. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/