X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <311ab5550612032320u69dfea80j41630ee625ffaf5b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 02:20:17 -0500
From: Ben <ben DOT alkov AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Please test the latest developer's snapshot
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Just wanted to drop in a note saying that I've tried the snapshot on
RTM Vista x64 on AMD, and I had no luck, either freshly installed, or
with rebase/rebaseall. I tried rebaseall with ash, but got the usual
Vista-related errors. I tried running rebase against ash, and then
rebaseall again, but still no joy. All of the above I ran using first
0x70000000 as base, and then 0x65000000.

Hope this helps!

Ben

 ----- Original Message -----
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: Please test the latest developer's snapshot

> Hi,
>
> The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains
> a couple of patches which are supposed to get Cygwin running better on
> the upcoming Windows Vista.
>
> The important change here is a slightly different memory allocation
> scheme.  I'd like to hear if this version still runs fine on all OSes,
> not only on Vista so I'd appreciate some feedback in terms of memory
> allocation problems.  Please look for messages as "fixup_mmap_after_fork
> failed", "couldn't allocate heap", stuff like that.
>
> The new memory allocation scheme could result in the necessity to rebase
> again.  The usual base address of 0x70000000 for rebase *might* result
> in problems with applications using mmap and runtime loaded DLLs.  So,
> if you get such a problem, please call rebase(all) with a base addresses
> of, say, 0x65000000 and try again.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/