X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <45732EF4.3060409@cygwin.com> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 15:09:24 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061108 Fedora/1.5.0.8-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin + make 10 time slower than equivalent linux make (same ifc compiler) References: <3da3d8310612031012n1f605a54ufeb71fce542c2524 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <3da3d8310612031012n1f605a54ufeb71fce542c2524@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/03/2006, Eliah Kagan wrote: > If not, could you use the make that comes with MinGW > (http://www.mingw.org/)? If a POSIX-like environment is required, > would MSYS do the trick as well (http://www.mingw.org/msys.shtml)? Since MSYS is an early fork of Cygwin, if the performance problem the OP is seeing is intrinsically Cygwin-based, MSYS will likely, though not guaranteed, share the performance problems. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/