X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <3da3d8310612031012n1f605a54ufeb71fce542c2524@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:12:56 -0500 From: "Eliah Kagan" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin + make 10 time slower than equivalent linux make (same ifc compiler) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/2/06, Philippe Conraux wrote: > I have to build a large project on Windows. > > Build libraries using Intel compilers needs 12 hours on cygwin > when same build needs 1 hour on Linux (same computer : dual boot, same > compilers ifc 9.1) Do you need a feature that is specific to cygwin's make or the cygwin environment? If not, could you use the make that comes with MinGW (http://www.mingw.org/)? If a POSIX-like environment is required, would MSYS do the trick as well (http://www.mingw.org/msys.shtml)? Alternatively, could you not simply cross-compile it for Windows on the Linux system? You said the workstation is dual-boot. If you have to be in Windows to perform other tasks while building it, perhaps you could virtualize (not emulate) some Linux system and cross-compile it that way. Finally, are you sure the problem even has anything to do with cygwin and cygwin's make? Perhaps ifc is slower on Windows than Linux for the sort of thing that you are doing? (In that case using MinGW's make, with or without MSYS, would probably not help.) -Eliah -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/