X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:18:37 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin + make 10 time slower than equivalent linux make (same ifc compiler) Message-ID: <20061202161837.GA1895@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20061202160132 DOT GC643 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 04:06:49PM +0000, Mark Moriarty wrote: >Line 47 of WHAT? I have the cygwin source, but no file reference was >given. Sorry. This was a joke. If speeding up Cygwin was as simple as removing a line, don't you think that it would have been done already? >From: Christopher Faylor <...> >Reply-To: ... >To: ... There is no reason, other than to feed spammers, for including email addresses in the text of a message. Please don't do that. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/