X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:01:32 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin + make 10 time slower than equivalent linux make (same ifc compiler) Message-ID: <20061202160132.GC643@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:06:57PM +0100, Eric Lilja wrote: >Philippe Conraux skrev: >>I have to build a large project on Windows. >> >>Build libraries using Intel compilers needs 12 hours on cygwin >>when same build needs 1 hour on Linux (same computer : dual boot, same >>compilers ifc 9.1) >> >>Equivalent build using Visual-Studio seems faster (not yet real measures) >> >>Is it a known issue with a fix? > >Sure, just recompile the cygwin.dll yourself with line 42 commented >out. Sigh. This has changed in 1.5.22. It is now line 47. Keep up with the program, people! cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/