X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Eric Lilja <mindcooler AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:  Re: cygwin + make 10 time slower than equivalent linux make (same  ifc compiler)
Date:  Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:06:57 +0100
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <ekrmof$jhk$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <mn DOT 12c37d6cb7b95ded DOT 65710 AT esi-group DOT com>
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
In-Reply-To: <mn.12c37d6cb7b95ded.65710@esi-group.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Philippe Conraux skrev:
> I have to build a large project on Windows.
> 
> Build libraries using Intel compilers needs 12 hours on cygwin
> when same build needs 1 hour on Linux (same computer : dual boot, same 
> compilers ifc 9.1)
> 
> Equivalent build using Visual-Studio seems faster (not yet real measures)
> 
> Is it a known issue with a fix?
> 
> 
> 
> 

Sure, just recompile the cygwin.dll yourself with line 42 commented out.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/