X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <455B5933.3080700@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:15:15 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060916 Fedora/1.5.0.7-1.fc4.remi Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Excessive thrashing when popen()ing after a large malloc() References: <20061114154207 DOT 3B49E148F021 AT u53026a DOT matapp DOT unimib DOT it> <455A9FEB DOT 3060809 AT tlinx DOT org> In-Reply-To: <455A9FEB.3060809@tlinx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Linda Walsh wrote: > Loic Grenie wrote: >> On Tue Nov 14 15:53:36 2006, Eric Blake (ebb9 AT byu DOT net ) wrote: >> >>> And admitting that your changes are untested is not a good sign for >>> getting it approved. >>> >> I'm not really "admitting", I am just expliciting that the patch is >> untested. I do not have the resources to build the thing. >> >> Sorry to have disturbed, happy cygwining, >> > Guess you didn't know that all posters are automatically on trial here to > defend their ideas and posts. Some can't help but take the role of > prosecutor & detective (too much CSI maybe?) :-). Objection! ...Oh sorry, that doesn't fit with CSI. Hm, I don't think anyone has died using Cygwin though... ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/