X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Bret Weinraub Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-3.2.3-5 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake byu.net> writes: > Evil. /bin/sh is supposed to be at the same version of bash, if you installed > things correctly. It sounds like your postinstall scripts did not run > correctly (perhaps you had bash or sh open when you ran setup.exe?). What are > the timestamps on those files ('ls -l /bin/{ba,}sh')? > > At any rate, the fix is to rerun the postinstall scripts, or more > quickly, 'cp /bin/bash /bin/sh'. Several machines at my site have turned up with the sh vs bash issue above, so I think something might be amiss with the installation scripts. The workaround of copying /bin/bash to /bin/sh works of course. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/