X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-Id: <200611081922.kA8JMOku023558@www.harkless.org>
From: Dan Harkless <cygwin-list AT harkless DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: sshd: "child_copy: linked dll data write copy failed" after computer reboot (Windows 2000 SP4)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:16:45 EST."              <20061108191645.GA22160@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:22:24 -0800
Received-SPF: pass (www.harkless.org: localhost is always allowed.)
X-Greylist: Sender is SPF-compliant, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (harkless.org [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:22:26 -0800 (PST)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com


On November 8, 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:00:44AM -0800, Dan Harkless wrote:
> >On November 8, 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:03:30PM -0800, Dan Harkless wrote:
> >>>I would suggest having the Cygwin webmaster update
> >>><http://cygwin.com/lists.html> to make the PCYMTNQREAIYR policy very clear
> >>>(right now there's only a vague hint at it with "...viewable by anyone. That
> >>>includes email addresses..."), including info that the archiver munges
> >>>header but not body email addresses, so that people will know about this
> >>>_before_ they make the mistake.
> >>
> >>It's not a vague hint.  This text was intended for idiots who can't
> >>comprehend that they are sending email to a public list.  It is to
> >>forestall people asking to have their messages removed from the
> >>archives.
> >
> >Not sure if you're calling me an idiot here. 
> 
> Are you unable to comprehend that you are sending email to a public list
> and will, at some point, ask to have your message removed from the
> archives?  If not, then I clearly wasn't talking about you.

No, it wasn't clear.  When you said "It's not a vague hint", it wasn't clear
if you meant "It's a clear instruction" or "It's not a hint at all".  I
certainly was sending email to a publically archived mailing list and
included a raw email address, which is what the quoted text refers to.

In any case, thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Dan Harkless
http://harkless.org/dan/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/