X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:25:35 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Please test the latest developer's snapshot Message-ID: <20061107152535.GE11304@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20061102224831 DOT GA8323 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <82velr8ooq DOT fsf AT vzell-de DOT de DOT oracle DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82velr8ooq.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Nov 7 12:46, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > >>>>> Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > Hi, > > The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains > > a couple of patches which are supposed to get Cygwin running better on > > the upcoming Windows Vista. > > > The important change here is a slightly different memory allocation > > scheme. I'd like to hear if this version still runs fine on all OSes, > > not only on Vista so I'd appreciate some feedback in terms of memory > > allocation problems. Please look for messages as "fixup_mmap_after_fork > > failed", "couldn't allocate heap", stuff like that. > > No problems so far. Running on Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2. Thanks for the feedback, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/